Editorial policy

Sources we use

Nintendo store pages and interviews come first. Then named reviews and technical write-ups, score aggregators, and game wikis with a URL at the bottom of the page. Search suggestions tell us what to answer. They do not supply the answer. A YouTube title can support a claim about a trailer. It cannot support a price.

If the US store says 24.9 GB and another store says 24.8 GB, both numbers stay. We do not average them. If Canada’s price is missing, the Canada cell is empty. We do not copy the US price across.

Status labels in tables look like “2 sources”, “1 source”, or “sources disagree”. The page ends with the links and the date we opened them. One limitation sentence covers the boundary of the piece. We do not scatter apologies through the prose.

Corrections go to the contact address. When a page changes, its date changes with it. We do not publish a score of our own, and we do not present an aggregator total as if we voted.

Do you test inside the game?

Pages say what public sources say. A single limitation line marks that boundary. We do not block a page on a console session.

What if sources disagree?

Both figures stay, with their names. We do not pick a winner without a reason we can cite.